Wednesday, February 25, 2009

SLUMDOG BACKLASH

About 65 million Indians - roughly a quarter of the urban population - live in slums, according to government surveys. Health care is often nonexistent, child labor is rampant and inescapable poverty forms the backdrop of everyday life.

Although everyone from the local butcher to the prime minister called the Oscar coup a proud day for the country, 'Slumdog Millionaire' was hardly a phenomenon with Indian audiences.
'Hit in the West, flop in the East,' read a front page headline in DNA's Sunday newspaper. The film was a tough sell in Indian movie theaters because it was largely in English, featured few giant stars, and skimped on the dance numbers.

Many people here also objected to its gritty portrayal of India, as well as its title, which some took as derogatory. The film sparked protests in Mumbai and at least one north Indian city by slum residents who said the movie demeaned the poor.

'No one can call me a dog,' Sheikh said on Monday. 'I work very hard.' A widow and mother of seven, Sheikh is a housekeeper who said she earns 600 rupees (S$18.50) a week.
She said the movie has been good for the families of Azhar and Rubina, but that her days are as difficult as ever.

'Look at my house,' she said, pointing to the walls made of rags and the mud floor covered with a thin plastic tarp. 'What has changed?'

They are enjoying your misery!

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

India to send men to space

Government approves $382m budget for two-man mission

India is poised to join the ranks of space giants Russia, the United States and China, after its government approved the budget for sending two astronauts into space in 2015. Last year, India became the third Asian country, after China and Japan, to send an unmanned moon mission.

Now, the government has given the green light for a manned space mission, allocating a budget of 12.4 billion rupees (S$382 million), according to Dr Montek Singh Ahluwalia, deputy chairman of the planning commission, which formulates the country's five-year development plans.

The decision was taken at a meeting last week with top officials of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and officials of the Department of Space, newspaper reports said.

'We had a good meeting. The general inference is that ISRO has done an expert job and it needs to be supported. The planning commission will support it,' Dr Ahluwalia was quoted by the Indian Express newspaper as saying. The project would be executed in two phases: an unmanned flight in 2013-14, and a manned space flight in 2014-15.

'We intend to put two persons in the vehicle and launch them into space for seven days in an orbit of 275km,' Dr K. Radhakrishnan, director of the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre and a member of the Space Commission, was quoted as saying by the Indian Express.

India has already demonstrated its capability in space flight by launching dozens of satellites and the unmanned moon mission in October last year that put a 1,400kg lunar probe into orbit.
The spacecraft Chandrayan-1 was sent to study the moon surface for evidence of water and precious metals over two years.

'We are already in space. We are better placed than when the Americans did it (manned space flight) earlier,' said Professor Yash Pal, a former director of the Space Applications Centre.

The ISRO had said earlier that the successful launch of the unmanned moon mission last year had given Indian space scientists the confidence to undertake a manned mission to the moon.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Slumdog Millionaire


“Slumdog Millionaire” took the best-picture Academy Award and seven other Oscars on Sunday, including director for Danny Boyle, whose ghetto-to-glory story paralleled the film’s unlikely rise to Hollywood’s summit.

The other top winners: Kate Winslet, best actress for the Holocaust-themed drama “The Reader”; Sean Penn, best actor for the title role of “Milk”; Heath Ledger, supporting actor for “The Dark Knight”; and Penelope Cruz, supporting actress for “Vicky Cristina Barcelona.”

A story of hope amid squalor in Mumbai, India, “Slumdog Millionaire” came in with 10 nominations, its eight wins including adapted screenplay, cinematography, editing and both music Oscars (score and song).

“Just to say to Mumbai, all of you who helped us make the film and all of those of you who didn’t, thank you very much. You dwarf even this guy,” Boyle said, holding up his directing Oscar.

The filmmakers accepted the best-picture trophy surrounded by both the adult professional actors who appeared among the cast of relative unknowns and some of the children Boyle cast from the slums of Mumbai.

The film follows the travails and triumphs of Jamal, an orphan who artfully dodges a criminal gang that mutilates children to make them more pitiable beggars. Jamal witnesses his mother’s violent death, endures police torture and struggles with betrayal by his brother, while single-mindedly hoping to reunite with the lost love of his childhood.

Fate rewards Jamal, whose story unfolds through flashbacks as he recalls how he came to know the answers that made him a champion on India’s version of “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire.”
As he took the stage to accept his prize for playing slain gay-rights pioneer Harvey Milk, Penn gleefully told the crowd: “You commie, homo-loving sons of guns.”

He followed with condemnation of anti-gay protesters who demonstrated near the Oscar site and comments about California’s recent vote to ban gay marriage.

“For those who saw the signs of hatred as our cars drove in tonight, I think it’s a good time for those who voted for the ban against gay marriage to sit and reflect on their great shame and their shame in their grandchildren’s eyes if they continue that support,” Penn said. “We’ve got to have equal rights for everyone.”

For his demented reinvention of Batman villain the Joker, Ledger became only the second actor ever to win posthumously, his triumph coming exactly 13 months after his death from an accidental overdose of prescription drugs.

His Oscar for the Warner Bros. blockbuster was accepted by Ledger’s parents and sister on behalf of the actor’s 3-year-old daughter, Matilda.

“I have to say this is ever so humbling, just being amongst such wonderful people in such a wonderful industry,” said his father, Kim Ledger. “We’d like to thank the academy for recognizing our son’s amazing work, Warner Bros., and Christopher Nolan in particular for allowing Heath the creative license to develop and explore this crazy Joker character.”
Since his death, the 28-year-old Ledger has gained a mythic aura akin to James Dean, another rising star who died well before his time.

The Joker was his final completed role, a casting choice that initially drew scorn from fans who thought Ledger would not be up to the task given Jack Nicholson’s gleefully campy rendition of the character in 1989’s “Batman.”

In the months before Ledger’s death, buzz on his wickedly chaotic performance swelled as marketing for the movie centered on the Joker and the perverted clown makeup he hid behind.
Ledger’s death fanned a frenzy of anticipation for “The Dark Knight,” which had a record $158.4 million opening weekend last summer.

The previous posthumous Oscar recipient was Peter Finch, who won best actor for 1976’s “Network” two months after his death.

Cruz triumphed as a woman in a steamy three-way affair with her ex-husband and an American woman in Woody Allen’s romance.

“Has anybody ever fainted here? Because I might be the first one,” Cruz said, who went on with warm thanks to Allen. “Thank you, Woody, for trusting me with this beautiful character. Thank you for having written all these years some of the greatest characters for women.”

“OK, that fainting thing, Penelope,” Winslet joked later as she accepted her best-actress prize for “The Reader,” in which she plays a former concentration camp guard in an affair with a teen. “I’d be lying if I haven’t made a version of this speech before. I think I was probably 8 years old and staring into the bathroom mirror, and this would be a shampoo bottle. But it’s not a shampoo bottle now.”

It was Winslet’s first win after five previous losses.

“Slumdog” writer Simon Beaufoy, who adapted the script from Vikas Swarup’s novel “Q&A,” said there are places he never could imagine being.

“For me, it’s the moon, the South Pole, the Miss World podium, and here,” Beaufoy said.
The epic love story “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” which led with 13 nominations, had three wins, for visual effects, art direction and makeup.

“The Dark Knight” had a second win, for sound editing.

“Milk” writer Dustin Lance Black offered an impassioned tribute to Milk.

“If Harvey had not been taken from us 30 years ago, I think he would want me to say to all the gay and lesbian kids out there tonight who have been told they are less than by the churches, by the government, by their families, that you are beautiful, wonderful creatures of value, and that no matter what anyone tells you, God does love you and that very soon, I promise you, you will have equal rights, federally, across this great nation of ours,” Black said.

“Man on Wire,” James Marsh’s examination of tight-rope walker Philippe Petit’s dazzling stroll between the towers of the World Trade Center in 1974, was chosen as best documentary.
The acting categories were presented by five past winners of the same awards, among them last year’s actress winners, Marion Cotillard and Tilda Swinton, plus Halle Berry, Nicole Kidman, Kevin Kline, Sophia Loren, Anthony Hopkins, Shirley MacLaine and Robert De Niro.

It was a much different style for the Oscars as each past recipient offered personal tributes to one of the nominees, without clips of the nominated performances. Awards usually are done in chit-chat style between a couple of celebrity presenters.

After last year’s Oscars delivered their worst TV ratings ever, producers this time aimed to liven up the show with some surprises and new ways of presenting awards. Rather than hiring a comedian such as past hosts Jon Stewart or Chris Rock, the producers went with actor and song-and-dance man Hugh Jackman, who has been host of Broadway’s Tony Awards.

Instead of the usual standup routine, Jackman did an engaging musical number to open the show, saluting nominated films with a clever tribute.

Jackman later did a medley staged by his “Australia” director Baz Luhrmann with such performers as Beyonce Knowles and “High School Musical” stars Vanessa Hudgens and Zac Efron.

“Slumdog Millionaire” went into the evening after a run of prizes from earlier film honors.

The film nearly got lost in the shuffle as Warner Bros. folded its art-house banner, Warner Independent, which had been slated to distribute “Slumdog Millionaire.” It was rescued from the direct-to-video scrap heap when Fox Searchlight stepped in to release the film.

“Slumdog” composer A.R. Rahman, a dual Oscar winner for the score and song, said the movie was about “optimism and the power of hope.”

“All my life, I’ve had a choice of hate and love,” Rahman said. “I chose love, and I’m here.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Prataman award

Singapore President SR Nathan has sent a letter to congratulate Thai King Bhumibol Adulyadej for receiving the first World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Global Leaders Award.
The recognition honours contributions by world leaders to the cause of intellectual property development.

In his note, Mr Nathan said with over 20 patents and 19 trademarks to his name, King Bhumibol will be an inspiration to the people and especially youths in Thailand.

He added the WIPO award is a clear recognition of the king’s lifelong and unwavering commitment to the promotion, development and respect for intellectual property.

Mr Nathan added that the award is also testimony to the king’s creativity and leadership.
King Bhumibol is the first recipient of the WIPO award, which was conferred by WIPO director—general Francis Gurry at a ceremony at the Klai Klangwon Palace in Hua Hin, Thailand, on January 14.

Apart from owning patents and trademarks, the king is also an artist with over 1,000 works, which include paintings, photographs as well as musical and literary compositions.

He obtained his first patent in 1993 for a technology to alleviate water shortages during the dry season.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Yes Man! His 11 days

PRESIDENT S R Nathan revealed yesterday why he agreed to the first-ever draw on past reserves, citing the severity of the downturn and the speed at which the economy was declining.

It took 11 days for the Government to seek and secure his in-principle approval, with Mr Nathan giving the nod just a day before the Budget was presented in Parliament on Jan 22.

The swiftness of the process, he said, stemmed from the urgency in giving the Government the confidence to roll out measures to tackle the recession which could worsen without fast action.

'I recognised the importance of giving confidence to go ahead with the measures proposed in the Budget for the particular reference to past reserves bearing in mind (that) if the situation prolongs or worsens, negative consequences would have kicked in, making any measures too late to be of any effect,' he told the Singapore media at the Istana.

He was making public for the first time his decision to allow the drawing down of $4.9 billion of past reserves to fund two schemes: a Jobs Credit scheme to subsidise wage costs in a bid to save jobs; and a Special Risk Sharing Initiative to give companies more access to credit.

Explaining the speed with which the decision was made, he said: 'The urgency was quite evident, and I think 11 days was reasonable. If it had to be, it could have been shorter.'

Mr Nathan also said in response to questions that he need not have held a press conference to explain the decision. He is required only to convey his decision in writing to Parliament in response to the Government's request.

But there was interest during the Budget debate about the process of dealing with past reserves, and questions of when past reserves can be used, he noted.

He made it clear that the steps taken to seek his approval did not bypass procedures and went by the book.

'Whether you take 11 days or one month, the process will be the same,' he noted. 'If we had the luxury of time, we'd have taken much longer. But the circumstances were such, people's confidence had to be restored.'

I was elected to assist the Government, not to add problems to their administration.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Prataman explains how he worked!

Singapore's President S R Nathan said the approval process to draw down S$4.9 billion from past reserves was a rigorous one.

Speaking in detail for the first time on Tuesday about his decision to give in-principle approval for the government to tap into past reserves, Mr Nathan said he and the Council of Presidential Advisers recognised the importance of giving full confidence and backing to the Budget measures as a speedy decision was needed to stem the tide of the economic downturn.

Mr Nathan, who is the first Singapore elected president to use the second key to unlock past reserves accumulated by the Singapore government, emphasised that the Constitution does not prescribe the process for dealing with a request for using past reserves.

All it spells out is the need for the president to consult the Council of Presidential Advisers and to publish his view when he approves a draw on past reserves.

"It is not easy to say 'yes' in so far as the withdrawal of the reserves go. There must be compelling reasons why we have to resort to withdrawing from past reserves," the president said.

During the recent Budget debate, several Members of Parliament had expressed the opinion that not many details about the process of unlocking the reserves and the use of the second key by the elected president were given.

Mr Nathan said he and the Council of Presidential Advisers had been kept in the loop about the global and domestic economic situation since the middle of last year.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong also discussed the situation with the president informally and sounded him out about the government having to seek his approval to tap on past reserves for some extraordinary measures that were being considered.

The Council of Presidential Advisers convened a meeting the same day when Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam approached the president with information on the Jobs Credit scheme and Special Risk-sharing Initiative.

The president and the council were briefed by the Trade and Industry Ministry and the Monetary Authority of Singapore on the global economic and financial situation, and its potential impact on Singapore.

The Finance Ministry, Accountant-General and Attorney-General's Chambers also briefed them on the Budget strategies and gave them a detailed explanation of the two measures.

President Nathan revealed that Mr Tharman's formal request seeking his in-principle approval to draw on past reserves was made on January 19 – three days before Budget 2009, which was brought forward to January 22 this year.

After going through the proposal the next day, the president said he gave his in-principle approval on January 21.

Mr Nathan said the rapidly deteriorating global economic situation and its adverse impact on Singapore's economy meant that he and his council of advisers had to address the request to use past reserves with urgency.

"In this instance, the process of seeking and securing my in-principle approval took approximately 11 days from the time the matter was first broached. The urgency was quite evident and I think 11 days was reasonable.

"If it had to be, it could have been even shorter. The target was the Budget and that was set. Whatever decision that had to be made, had to be made in time so that it can go into the proposal," he said.

As for his feelings about having used the second key for the first time, Mr Nathan said: "I was hoping not, but the circumstances came and of course it is provided that if and when it comes, an approach will be made to me.

"But I have the advice of the Council of Presidential Advisers, which I have to pay regard to. And we started the process of consulting together and I then left it to them to deliberate on their own and give me their recommendations, which were consistent with what I had felt I should do."

At the end of the day, Mr Nathan said the system was tested and he has responded to the urgency of the situation after clinically examining the government's proposal to use past reserves to battle the economic downturn.

The government has presented the Supply Bill to Mr Nathan for his assent on Monday, according to the government gazette. This assent would formally approve the provision to draw on past reserves.

I was paid $3million a year not to "Micro-manage"

Monday, February 16, 2009

CIA helped India, Pakistan after Mumbai attacks

They now needs the whites to solve their differences!

WASHINGTON: The US Central Intelligence Agency helped arrange back-channel intelligence exchanges between India and Pakistan in the wake of the Mumbai attacks in order to avoid conflict between the two nations, The Washington Post reported.

Citing unnamed US and foreign government sources, the newspaper said that due to the CIA's effort the two countries quietly shared highly sensitive intelligence while the Americans served as neutral arbiters.

The exchanges included sophisticated communications intercepts and an array of physical evidence detailing how the 10 Mumbai gunmen and their supporters planned and executed their three-day killing spree in the Indian port city, the report said.

Indian and Pakistani intelligence agencies separately shared their findings with the CIA, which vetted the intelligence and filled in blanks with its own information, said The Post.

The paper said the arrangement was ongoing, and it was unknown whether it would continue after the Mumbai case is settled.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Tourists stay away from 'Incredible India'

(Reuters) - It's billed as one of the world's most luxurious and romantic train journeys. An old-world tour of India's palaces and lakes, all the way to the Taj Mahal.

Despite great expectations when it was launched in January, the Royal Rajasthan on Wheels train, with $2,000 suites and gourmet dining cars, has at times been left languishing in the rail yards as the global economic crisis and the aftermath of the Mumbai attacks put the brakes on India's tourist boom.

The new luxury train Royal Rajasthan on Wheels (RROW)

"If you don't have guests, what's the point of running the train?" asked Supinder Singh, the president of Palace Tours.

India has seen its tourist arrivals drop in recent months for the first time since 2002 when it launched its hugely successful "Incredible India" campaign that enticed millions of well-heeled tourists from around the world to explore the wonders of India.

Winter is peak season, but this year business has been slow and hotels are struggling to fill empty rooms due to mass cancellations by foreign tourists. All sectors have been hit, from pricey tours of Rajasthan, to budget beach holidays in Goa.

When Palace Tours launched the Royal Rajasthan on Wheels in January it had high hopes the $8 million train would be inundated with bookings by wealthy tourists seeking to explore India in the comfort of a five-star train compartment, with wireless Internet, a spa and silver-service dining on demand.

Instead, the Royal Rajasthan on Wheels has either been relegated to the rail yards due to lack of passengers or plied the journey through Rajasthan to the Taj Mahal in Agra, with only a handful of the possible 82 visitors it can carry.

"I think there are more staff than us," said Amrit Dhaliwal, a tourist who traveled on the near empty train this month with her husband.

The American couple were among 10 passengers who embarked on the trip from New Delhi, welcomed by traditional musicians sitting on cushions and playing flutes and drums.

"We didn't realize it would have so few people on it. It would have been nice to have had more people," said Amrit's husband Kulwant.

Several of the visitors on the train were upgraded from the less lavish Palace on Wheels, a sister train that is operating at about 60 percent capacity instead of its usual 100 percent.

Tourism contributes more than 6 percent to India's GDP of $1 trillion, and employs 53 million people directly or indirectly. Foreign tourist arrivals to India dropped 12 percent to 522,000 in December, compared to 596,560 in the same month in 2007.

An attendant works inside Sheesh Mahal, a restaurant coach of the new luxury train RROW.

The plunge in arrivals has hurt the entire sector from New Delhi, to Agra, to the beaches of Goa and Kerala, which in recent years have become favorite haunts for European tourists soaking up the sun during the winter at home.

Boats and fishing gear are more visible than sunbathers on some of the most popular beaches of Kerala, and business is so slow that restaurant waiters and shopkeepers vie for the odd tourist seen wandering about the streets.

"The specter of cancellations we have been witnessing following the global meltdown has increased in the wake of the terror strikes," said Peter Kurien, the general manager of the Jasmine Palace hotel.

"All the hotels and restaurants used to be filled to capacity at this time of the year. They are half empty now."

Aside from the global economic woes which have prompted many potential tourists to tighten their belts and stay home, India is still reeling from the Mumbai attacks in which Islamist gunmen killed 179 people in a three-day shooting spree in November that was broadcast live on television news channels around the world.

Foreigners appear to have been targeted as the gunmen attacked two luxury hotels, a popular night spot and a Jewish center in India's financial capital.

Since then, countries have issued advisories against traveling to India and popular tourist areas such as Goa have been on alert for more attacks.

"There was a slowdown anyway," said Dhruv Shringi, the CEO and co-founder of Yatra.com travel.

"Post the Mumbai attacks, we had almost a 22 percent cancellation in December and it's about 15 percent in January. So my worry is this trend seems to be continuing into February."

Hotel occupancy rates in the seaside town of Kovalam in Kerala were at 60 percent over the peak season, compared to nearly 100 percent at the same time last year.

Ratings agency Crisil said in a report in January that "hotel occupancy rates (in India) are expected to show their steepest decline in a decade."

The deluxe "Lalgarh Palace" suite of the new luxury train Royal Rajasthan on Wheels.

'OSTRICH MENTALITY'?
A slump risks undermining India's enormous growth potential in the tourism sector, which the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) says has been let down in the past by a lack of adequate accommodation and poor infrastructure.

Despite its size and array of historical monuments, India ranks at no. 42 in the world's holiday destinations of choice.

Slashing hotel rates, offering buy-one-get-one-free air tickets and free spa treatments are some measures being introduced to entice visitors. Security has been visibly beefed up at many of India's plushest hotels, especially in New Delhi and Mumbai.

But some tour operators are frustrated by what they see as the government's failure to address the sector's relatively slow progress compared to other destinations.

It rankles that smaller Asian rivals such as Thailand, which ranks at number 18 in the foreign tourist arrival rankings, and Malaysia, at 11, are far ahead of the south Asian giant.

"What is there in Malaysia? What is there in Thailand?" asked Sujit Banerjee, the secretary of the Ministry of Tourism at a crisis meeting for the tourism sector in January. "Only 5 percent of India has been shown to the world.

Tour operators say India is seen as a "hardship destination" even as hotels in major cities charge up to $400 a night.

"If you land at the airport and if it takes you an hour-and-a-half to get your bags and then you have to fight in a taxi queue, that's not really the kind of experience you want as a customer," Shringi of Yatra.com said.

An advertising campaign featuring one of India's biggest Bollywood stars has been launched to send a message to touts hassling tourists that "guest is god."

"India is not giving value for money," said Himmat Anand, the managing director of Diethelm Travel India. "There is an ostrich mentality amongst us when we say everything is alright."

Friday, February 13, 2009

Death sentence for murders

Murder and rape convict Moninder Singh Pandher steps out of a police van outside a court in Ghaziabad, India on Thursday.

AN INDIAN court sentenced a businessman and his domestic employee to death on Friday for the murder of a young girl - one of 19 victims in a case that has shocked the country. Moninder Singh Pandher and his servant Surinder Koli were found guilty on Thursday of the rape and murder of 14-year-old Rimpa Halder, and face trial on 18 similar counts plus charges of abduction.

Most of their alleged victims were children.

There was nationwide revulsion in December 2006 after police recovered skulls, bones and body parts from sewage drains near Pandher's house - dubbed the 'House of Horrors' - in Noida, a wealthy satellite city of the Indian capital New Delhi.

Koli confessed to cannibalism and necrophilia.

Judge Rama Jain called the gruesome crimes the 'rarest of rare' in declaring the sentence.
India has not carried out an execution since 2004, although death sentences are still handed down.

The victim's family rejoiced at the sentence.

'We are happy with the court's decision. It shows that poor people like us can also get justice. This is victory for all children in the country,' said Halder's father Anil.

In 2007 police said Koli confessed to having abducted children from a slum area, then killing them in his employer's home and disposing of the remains in drains. Some of the victims were as young as three and police believe most of the murder victims were raped or sexually assaulted.
Koli reportedly admitted under interrogation that he raped children as young as three, had sex with the corpses of his victims and once tried to eat human organs, believing cannibalism cured impotency. In all, police found 69 bags filled with human parts from sewers outside Pandher's home.

Pandher's son Karan told reporters he would rather his father was executed immediately than have to face trial on the remaining counts which could take years, given India's slow-moving justice system.

'I would rather wish that my father is given capital punishment right away,' his son said. The other cases 'will be fought on the same evidence and my father will be doomed to be in jail for his entire life.' Pandher's son previously blamed media pressure for his father's guilty verdict.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

“Ahpunehneh” is not a proper word

http://deadpoetscave.com/2006/06/the-silence-is-broken

It is not a Tamil word. Nor it is an English word. Nor it is a Greek word. Hell, it is NOT even a word. It is gibberish of the purest kind. Yes, yes. I hear all the gasping and “Did you hear that?!” and “Is it true?”. Yes it’s true. If there is one gibberish that is to be flushed down the toilet, this is it.

I am tired. Tired beyond words to explain what this gibberish has done. I am pretty much sure almost all my Indian counterparts will agree. Been called “Ahpunehneh” in a country that calls itself happily multiracial. There is nothing happy about this. I now take it upon myself to give all my clueless Singaporeans a much needed enlightment on this. Read and read well. And pass it on. Because the next time i hear or read that blasted gibberish, I won’t be patient. Anymore.
It makes me cringe just to think of the gibberish, much less typing it. But what has to be done has to be done. I can’t stress enough. “Ahpunehneh” is not a word. It’s a disgracing gibberish. I once read a comment on MrBrown’s blog that ahpunehneh is a form of respect for elder brother. Form of respect my ass is more like it.

But still, let’s autopsy this stinking mess. This gibberish can be broken down into 2 parts; Ahpu and nehneh. “Ahpu” looks and sounds like the mutated clone of an olden Indian name “Apu”. The name “Apu” was and is in use in India. But I doubt if anyone has been named Apu in Singapore for the past 20years or so. ‘Cause, Apu is, after all, a very old name. And no sane Singaporean parent would want to name their son something that has been used as a racist remark.

The second part, “nehneh”. Just what the hell is this? It is no word in the Tamil language.

Yes. And stop arguing that it is. ‘Cause this is my mother tongue language and not yours. Just because you know a couple of Tamil words and can somewhat mispronounce them doesn’t mean you know this language. The nearest I can place this gibberish is to the Tamil word “Annan”. “Annan” in Tamil means elder brother. We all know that most languages are bound to have these 2 kind of forms; the formal written form and the informal spoken form. For example, “relax” is the formal written form and “relac” is the informal spoken form. In this case “Annan” is the is formal written form. And the way it is said in informal way is “Annah”.

Stop. Before you start agruing that it’s the same. It is not. It is not said in the highly ridiculous singalong tone you use. Another thing is, in chinese you can say papa, mama, poh poh. You can say the word twice and it would still mean you are calling you dad, mom and grandmom. This doesn’t apply to Tamil. Shortening a word then saying it twice doesn’t work in Tamil. Therefore shortening “Annah” to “neh” to “nehneh” is not correct. Don’t think you twist and turn my mother tongue language and claim it’s ok to do so. ‘Cause i will bitch-slap you. So my guess is, there was some guy called Apu in the earlier days of Singapore. And people chopped, pounded and minced the word “Annah” and mutated it into “neh” and postfixed it to “Apu” and voila! You have a gibberish that is known nationwide used to address all Indians.

Now that I have done the autopsy, lets proceed to other things that is related to this gibberish. My dear fellow Singaporeans, you look fucking retarded saying things in a singalong manner and claiming that’s how we sound. There was once I was at Dover station with my group of newly made friends from class. Then one of them said a few sentences in a high singalong tone and weird ass accent. Then started to laugh. The rest didnt know how to respond, because for a starter, this was done in front of a Indian girl. Me. I just looked at him and started to double over with laughter.

After catching my breath, I told him “Did you know how fucking retarded you looked and sounded just now dude?! OH MY GOD!!” and promptly went into fits of laughter again. Red faced, he defended himself by saying “But that’s how you all sound”. I looked him in the eye and asked “Do i sound like that?”. “Err, no..” was his reply. “Does S(another Indian classmate of ours) sound like that?”. “Err..no la..But that’s how they sound in the movies”. “Which part of the movie?”. “The song lor”. This, is the highest form of stupidness i have encountered in my life. A song is supposed to be in a singalong manner, no? So for the record, we don’t talk in a ’singalong’ manner. It’s just your inability to understand a song is a song and doesn’t apply to talking as well. You people definitely don’t talk like Jay Chou or Sammi Cheng or any Chinese artiste’s singing. It’s the same. So quit it.

Next. Repeat after me. Brown is not black. Black is not brown. We have people from different walks of life and somehow in this nationwide disorder, almost all chinese cannot differentiate brown from black. Once again another example that happened to me. This happened in the first year of uni. After one of the lectures, i was waiting at the back of the lecture room, for a couple of my clique guys. This part of the lecture room was not lit but rest assured the rest of the room was. So it is understood the part i was standing wasn’t pitch black. Then another guy from another clique, who was standing near me, turned and said this “Hey TC, why you stand there? You so black, still stand there. Cannot see you lor. *Insert laughter*” The following was the connversation that happened between us after he said this. All my replies were said in a deadpan face and tone.

Me : Now that’s a pity. How long have you been having this disability?
Him : Huh? What disability? What you talking?
Me : Ya what. This color-blindness disability of yours. Have you been having it since young? Never got it checked ah?
Him : *clearly in a confused state* Color blindness?! Where got? Don’t have what..
Me : Yes. It is color blindness. You can’t differentiate brown from black.
Him : *Finally understanding what i was getting at* Oh..aiya..I thought what..
Me : Seriously, you ought to have it checked lor. Can be quite dangerous.
Him : *laughs* How can it be dangerous..
Me : It will be, when i punch you. (Note to everyone. I am not exaggerating. I am capable of throwing a punch to the face)
Him : Hehe, sorry la. Brown and black the same what.
Me : What’s the color of my TShirt?
Him : Black lor.
Me : And my skin?
Him : Hehehe. Brown..ok la ok la..sorry..

I maybe perceived as an anal retentive person in the conversation above. But I don’t appreciate called “black”. Simply because I am not. I am chocolate brown. The bottom line is brown is not black. Black is not brown.

Third. Holding your noses when an Indian comes near you. Some of the older Indians and India nationals (these are 2 different kind of people) adore their coconut or jasmine hair oils. It have been their practise for centuries and just because you can’t stand it, they are not gonna quit. It’s the same how an Amercian will first react to durian.

Do you as a Singaporean give up eating durian just because someone unused to it claims it’s smelly? No i suppose. That been said, not all Indians use these oils. As much as I have observed, modern image conscious Singaporean Indians, don’t use it. So it’s unfair to automatically hold your nose when any Indian comes near you. What are you, a no brainer robot? It’s not like every ah pek, ah mah, uncle and auntie I come across is sweet smelling. Some reek of sweat and body odour. Which is much more worse than coconut and jasmine oil if you ask me.

Fourth. Indian girls and ladies wear a “dot” on our forehead. The proper name is “pottu” but forget it. You are still gonna call it a dot. It is not there for infrared or bluetooth purposes like how one sms from my poly fren claimed to. I am still pissed.

It’s sad to let you all know that this racist behaviour comes mostly from Chinese(not as if you guys don’t know it in the first place). Which is why i can only write about what I have encountered. Just because this race forms the majority of Singapore doesn’t mean it’s superior.

Simply because, it’s not. And I don’t know how long more i will be patient to these kind of racist treatment. Of course, 90% of my friends are chinese. Not all are like this. It’s just too contradictory to claim ourselves as a multiracial country. Yes we have different races and we have one whole day called Racial Harmony Day and we live in relative harmony. But that is only possible because people like me, who have been subjected to racist treatment since young, prefer to keep quiet. But how long do you think we will keep quiet? Patience is only this much. I seriously had enough of all your “ahpunehneh” rubbish, holding noses and all racist acts. And parents, if your kid points and says “ahpunehneh”, correct him/her. Don’t you freaking ignore it or worse encourage it. If i see one more kid look in my general direction and say “ahpunehneh”, i will throttle him/her til he can’t remember the rubbish ever again. I swear i will do it. Because i had enough.

Now that i have said all, whoever reads this, if you are Singaporean, and have done any of the above mentioned or know of people who done or does any of the above, read this entry and read it well. ‘Cause i don’t like to repeat. Print this out, distribute or mention it in your blog. I don’t care. I just want this to gibberish to stop. Because me and my Indian race had enough.
And all my Indian counterparts, whether I know you or not, if any of the above have happened to you, I feel your frustration. Share with me what were your experiences. Everyone else who wants to say something. Go ahead. But do it in a civilised way.

You have been warned.

Sunday, February 08, 2009

India against Singapore

We'll stop promoting S'pore as tourist spot

By Desmond Ng

THEY'VE already boycotted the sale of Singapore Airlines (SIA) tickets in India.

Their next target - stop promoting Singapore as a tourist destination.

Over 2,000 travel agents in several cities in India took to the streets last Friday to protest against SIA's move to scrap commission on ticket sales last November.

Over 1,000 agents participated in the march at Kochi in the southern Indian state of Kerala, 500 agents in Delhi and Bangalore and close to 400 agents marched for approximately 3 km in South Mumbai with banners.

Some 200 agents participated in the action at Kolkata and Chennai. About 150 agents marched in Pune and 40 agents marched in Lucknow.

SIA is the largest foreign carrier operating in India.

The message to SIA - pay us our 5 per cent commission or face the consequences.

But SIA, along with major carriers including Lufthansa and Air France, have said no because of the high cost of jet fuel.

They have told agents to charge the commission to customers instead.

Singapore next casualty?

But should the standoff with SIA continue any longer, the next casualty could well be Singapore, warned the Travel Agents Federation of India (TAFI) national general secretary Ajay Prakash.
He said that the trade will decide to withdraw its support to promote Singapore as a travel destination if the situation does not improve.

Mr Prakash told The New Paper yesterday: 'We want to impress that this could escalate into a bigger situation where we stop facilitating movement to Singapore. We want Singapore Tourism Board (STB) to appeal to SIA to pay the commission.'

He said the federation met an STB representative in India last Thursday to discuss the standoff.
'It's in no one's interest if the standoffs continue. Tourists from India is a key market for Singapore.

'About 779,000 tourists from India travelled to Singapore last year. But this can only come if the trade does actively promote the country,' he said.

About 10.1 million visitors visited Singapore last year, with tourism revenues reaching a record $14.8 billion.

Visitors from India, Indonesia, China, Australia and Malaysia accounted for about 50 per cent of total arrivals.

But these numbers are expected to drop this year due to the global downturn.

Said Mr Prakash: 'Everybody realises that travel has slowed down. It's in no one's interest to have this boycott.

'We all need to be selling tickets and making money. I am not in the business of running protest and boycotts.'

They last met SIA representatives in December but the dispute was not resolved.

For now, travellers in India will have to get their tickets direct from SIA or through online travel portals that are not part of the protest.

They can also travel on other carriers to Singapore.

SIA spokesman Stephen Forshaw said that the company has been in touch with the travel agents in India on the issue of transaction fees in place of commissions and the company remains committed to continue their dialogue with them.

The boycott has not hurt the company significantly.

Said Mr Forshaw: 'For example, our fare specials in India that ran from 29 Dec 2008 to 15 Jan 2009 for travel to Singapore and beyond received a very good response. We are seeing a shift on the part of customers to booking online more now.'

He said that not all travel agents are participating in the boycott, and indeed, many are still booking tickets for their customers on Singapore Airlines flights.

Customers can also buy tickets direct from the SIA website.

Said Mr Forshaw: 'Since the 'boycott' started, we have noticed an increase in sales generated via our website.

'The key message to those travel agents who think this boycott is having an effect is that they are taking business away from their own community and driving it to our website.'

Under the commission model, the airline pays the agent a fixed percentage of the basic fare, irrespective of the services provided by the agent to the customer.

The agent who provides a better level of service receives the same amount as one who provides a basic service.

SIA believes that this is an outdated model and many travel markets worldwide, including here in Singapore, have moved away from this, in favour of service fee-based models.

The STB could not respond by press time.

This article was first published in The New Paper on Feb 6, 2009.

Friday, February 06, 2009

Prataman and his Helpers

CPA of President Nathan, Mr Lim Chee Onn, Mr Po'ad Bin Shaik Abu Bakar Mattar, Mr S Dhanabalan, Mr J Y Pillay, Prof Cham Tao Soon, Mr Yong Pung How, Mr Goh Joon Seng and Mr Stephen Lee Ching Yen.

Thursday, February 05, 2009

Prataman's Job

What were the President’s reasons for approving the reserves, and what process did he go through to approve it?

Below is an excerpt from the report by Channel NewsAsia:

“The concern arises over the way the 2—key system operates. It seems the 2—key system operates simultaneously at the same time. When the government key says “unlock”, the other key unlocks automatically,” said Low Thia Khiang, MP for Hougang.

Mr Tharman said: “This is not a ’wayang’ (show)… The point is: the President, advised by the CPA (Council of Presidential Advisers), makes an independent and careful judgement on the government’s case.”

MP for Tampines GRC, Irene Ng, said: “Can I ask the minister whether the process can be refined and improved further so that in future we can make the process more transparent — that the public knows that the institution of the President is one that is strong, and that it can exercise an independent turn of the key.”

Inderjit Singh, MP for Ang Mo Kio GRC, said: “What’s missing is the process that the President took after he got briefed by the government. If we could get a sense of what they discussed and what process they went through to decide, then this may clear many of these questions.”

But Mr Tharman said: “I’m not sure why it is relevant. At the end of the day, this is a system that is different from Norway and Australia, where as much detail as possible is provided.

“This is a system that relies on trust in the individuals who are in charge, including those appointed to the CPA and the Elected President. Do you trust them? Have they made decisions wisely? Has the government been acting responsibly?”

Do you trust them? Have they made decisions wisely? Has the government been acting responsibly?

Sunday, February 01, 2009

Just for laughes

This psychiatrist walks into his waiting room and sees two men. One is hanging upside down from the ceiling. The other is sawing an imaginary piece of wood. The doctor approaches the man who is sawing and asks him what he is doing.

'I'm sawing wood,' the man replies.

'And what's your friend doing?' the doctor asks.

'Oh, he thinks he's a light bulb.'

'Well, don't you think you should tell him to get down? The blood is rushing to his head.'

'What, and work in the dark?'